Sonntag, 30. September 2012
Freitag, 28. September 2012
Mittwoch, 26. September 2012
Montag, 24. September 2012
Sonntag, 23. September 2012
Michelbach warnt vor zunehmender Politisierung von Unternehmen
Michelbach warnt vor zunehmender Politisierung von Unternehmen – „Frauenquote soll Koalition spalten“
Angesichts der Unterstützung aus Teilen der CDU für eine gesetzliche Frauenquote mahnte der Sprecher des Wirtschaftflügels die Christdemokraten zur „Rückkehr auf einen klaren ordnungspolitischen Kurs“. Scharf kritisierte er die Forderung der Unions-Frauengruppe im Bundestag nach einer Freigabe des Abstimmungsverhaltens. „Hier geht es nicht um Gewissensfragen. Die CDU-Frauen sollten sich nicht zum Handlanger von Rot-Grün machen lassen und die Koalition spalten.“
Freitag, 14. September 2012
News agencies around the world reported on the attack of militants on the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi, Libya, on the evening of September 11. The attack took place because of the movie which was insulting the Prophet Muhammad, some Arab countries held demonstrations outside the U.S. Embassies, but only in Libya, it was attacked. According to media reports, the U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens was killed in a missile attack but according to available photographs it shows that he was dragged out of the car while still alive and lynched. The rest of the embassy staff, except for the ambassador and 3 more people have managed to escape. The U.S. Embassy had been looted and set on fire.
# Scene of the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi after attack
According to the same media in Benghazi, on September 12, a group of U.S. Marines arrived who specialize in combat in an urban environment.
According to eyewitness reports from Benghazi, the U.S. flag at the embassy had been replaced by a black flag of Al-Qaeda. It was even reported by the Libyan puppet government newspapers: they said the participants in the attack were representatives of two groups of former rebels – “February 17 Brigade” and the “The Followers of Sharia Brigade”. One informed source said that the attack on the U.S. Embassy in Libya was revenge for the killing of Abu Yahya Al Libby, a member of al-Qaeda.
Members of the Green Libyan Resistance even got in touch with the commanders of the American occupational forces and in exchange for the details of the impending attack they asked to release Libyans from prison of Al-Qaeda and NATO in Libya. But the Americans refused an offer; such an attack was needed for the Americans. Later, some deputy minister of the current puppet government of Libya put the blame on the Libyan Resistance. We would like to remind you that since February 2011, the Libyan people were lynched and these crimes were recorded by mobile phone cameras of these so-called "revolutionaries."
We would like to remind you that the U.S. ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens was previously authorized representative of the White House to the so-called "Transitional Council" in Benghazi; he was the link between the U.S. and NTC. Before that, in 2007-09 he served as a career diplomat in Libyan Jamahiriya. Under the cover of deputy head of the U.S. diplomatic mission he was preparing the so-called revolution in Libya. The first question is why the U.S. ambassador was seized by militants - Islamists? Moreover, the rebels had been given the opportunity to catch him alive and to lynch him. The Embassy Security should have protected and evacuated him first as a priority. Judging the lynching process from the photos that were actually made by the Islamists themselves, he was alone in the car. As a result the following conclusion comes to mind: that he was made as much a victim as those who were in the Twin Towers in USA. His murder has brought two benefits for the USA: first - the keeper of secret information about U.S. - NATO connection with the "revolutionaries" was kiled, second benefit - the United States get a pretext to send to Libya additional troops for new phase of occupation. The second question is: What the U.S. Marine troops that were sent to protect the embassy in Benghazi would be doing if the embassy already has been evacuated? The answer is obvious - to terrorize the civilian population and to capture members of the Libyan Resistance, whose addresses become known and that’s why Libyan Resistance was to blame. In particular, despite the fact that the black flag of Al Qaeda was raised over the U.S. Embassy in the night on Wednesday, 12 of September. The attack on the U.S. embassy and the killing of the Ambassador is the beginning of a new phase of occupation of Libya. It was planned ahead in case of high activity by the Resistance. In Libya in order to "restore order, assist in the establishment of democracy and security, at the request of the Libyan authorities" an additional occupational forces will be brought in. What it will mean for the Libyans, we already know from the photos of Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, Bagram and other photographs and videos taken by the Americans themselves, in which they rape for fun, kill and commit other crimes, which constitute war crimes against humanity. The same killers and NATO squad executioners will be transferred to Libya; they have long been prepared for this. The date, September 11, for the another provocation created by the U.S. administration was not chosen by chance. In their minds the citizens of this country have formed the view that as a retribution for the terrorist attack on this day it’s given to occupy more than one country and kill in millions of countries population that the State Department declared as enemies of Democracy.
News from Green Resistance:
Al-Qaeda preparing new terroristic acts in Libya against civilian and puppet gov of Libya preparing demonstration in streets in order to make more more people the victims of terroristic act and justice this way US NATO invasion by false flag of defence civilian from terrorists.
As we told before, in Libya be same as in Iraq or Afganistan during occupation of NATO.